5/18/2023 0 Comments Misogyny by Gail Ukockis![]() The proportion of women with optimistic bias about reproductive health problems related to endocrine disruptors was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the comparison group only at 12 weeks post-intervention (χ2 = 33.56, p =. 001) and there was an interaction effect of group and time (F = 41.26, p <. The effects remained consistent over time (F = 59.96, p <. ![]() A significant difference was found in protective behaviors between the groups (F = 81.21, p <. Descriptive statistics, repeated-measures ANOVA, and the McNemar test were conducted. Data were collected at baseline and 4 and 12 weeks post-intervention. With a convenience sample of 140 women, 60-minute online education sessions and a 30-minute booster session were provided to seven small groups, while the comparison group received a leaflet. A quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent comparison group was used with a pretest and double posttest. This study examined the effects of an action-guided intervention on reducing optimistic bias about reproductive health problems related to endocrine disruptors and improving protective behaviors against endocrine disruptors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |